<blockquote>There’s another interesting wrinkle in this story. Last summer, <strong>Jeff Bezos</strong> bought <em>The Washington Post </em>and promised he wouldn’t interfere with the paper—<em>Post </em>publisher <strong>Katherine Weymouth</strong> has <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/katharine-weymouth-explains-decision-to-sell-the-washington-post-to-jeff-bezos/2013/08/06/dff17f76-feb4-11e2-96a8-d3b921c0924a_story.html" target="_blank">said</a> that Bezos “understands that the paper is going to write articles about Amazon and him and his friends that he may not like, and he understands that.” <em>The New York Times </em>has published two stories about Amazon’s spat with Hachette. As of midnight on Sunday, The <em>Post</em> has posted <a href="https://twitter.com/jackshafer/status/464760552393547776" target="_blank">zero</a>.</blockquote>
via <a href="http://www.mhpbooks.com/amazon-axes-hachette-sales-over-the-latest-contract-dispute/">The Everything-But-Hachette Store: Amazon resorts to extortion to leverage more money out of Hachette » MobyLives</a>.